Zaluska or Forster?

There's a reason why Celtic have spent relatively big money on Forster. Zaluska is no no1 at a club the size of Celtic. Unfortunately Forster has not been extremely magnificent either. For a man of his size Forster doesn't really have any charisma nor presence.

 

picked Forster but don't think either is good enough for a first team place. Wouldn't mind both as back up though

 

Bump......

I really dislike Forster,think he is just a poor keeper overall

No wonder there is unrest in the behind the scenes ,Zaluska has to sit and watch this
guy move like 90 year old

now am * off again


* this team...............

 

I though FF was good yesterday, made some very good stops.

However I still prefer Zaluska.

 

me i would be the best keeper but i personally think zaluska is the better goalie

 

I agree with both points, well, substituting myself for you in the first instance!

 

Zaluska is better. Forster is a bombscare. This is strange but do you know who he reminds me of ? Christophe Berra at Wolves. I hate seeing him in a Scotland shirt. He can go the full game or even a few games without a mistake but then his concentration goes and he * kills us. Forster is the same.

 

I would like to see Zaluska starting something at the back has to change he seems to command his box and the numpties in the back 4 alot better than Forster

 

Zaluska as he commands his defence better and can sweep up behind them too something FF cannot do

 

Zaluska!

 

Zaluska by a mile! He controls the defence a lot better

 

I think we've seen enough from Forster (The Stand Alone Goalie) Get Zaluska back in between the sticks.

 

Zaluska gets down for low shots which FF can't do! Zaluska is our no.1 FF is just the loanee for back up!

 

Zaluska

 

i like Zaluska, but Forster for me

 

both * but zaluska

 

this is one of my pet hates with this guy,seems to stand there and watch the ball go by him all the time

the guys pish and lennon loves him