Scott Sinclair!

My uncle said * them it was a stonewaller earlier on. I thought I was biased!.

He virtually collapses at the slightest of touches..

I'll take it without doubt but think too many are trying to call it with spec's on as to not admit Sinclair dived..

 

Aye fuckit mate. I can't deny it doesn't make me laugh like * that it gets it up every other * but I think we all know what it was..

 

* need to remember some of the pens we have/haven’t been given at Hampden!

2012 - joe Ledley ball is kicked off his hand pen.

2015 - josh meekings wonder save missed by 3 officials

2017 - penalty given to hibs when clearly boyata plays the ball

Want to go into league games

2017 - Griffiths manhandled by Hill
2017 - Ambrose manhandles Sinclair
2017 - schalk goes down with no one within 4 feet of him

Soft pen but still a pen!

 

Stonewaller. Red card was harsh but the defender knew was he was doing. Tried to be clever and discreet by pulling his arm, putting him off balance and getting in front of him.

Doesn’t really matter if Sinclair could’ve stayed up or not. The pull on him disadvantaged him and was well within his rights to go down.

 

100 percent mate.

Scotty did hit the deck, but there was definite contact, so a penalty it is, and if it was outside the box we'd have gotten the free kick.

The red card was maybe harsh, but he should've walked earlier, so * them

 

https://twitter.com/sportinglife/status/934861799844909057

Check that out ffs haha! Fairies playing the game these days

 

Was never a pen and would have been raging if it was given against us..

 

Personally i think the penalty was an extremely soft one.. BUT

if it will wind up the Sevco fans even more then i will definitely agree that it should never have been given ..

 

Was watching an old final today against 'well (we won 3 nil, screamer from Ki, Wilson 2nd and power fk from mulgrew) at 1 nil though that * Craigen and on edge of his box falls over and decides he's a goalie and punches the ball away. So blatant and should have been off cos big samaras was away, nothing no even a fk.

 

If it was given against us I’d be raging because of the minimal contact but I’m heavily biased towards Celtic and would look for any reason to absolve our players of any blame.

On the other hand though if I was a neutral watching the game, I’d see it as a penalty all day. The little pull however brief stopped Sinclair from being in a more favourable position in front of goal. He’s more than entitled to go down.

 

For me, it's a penalty. A soft one granted, but it is a penalty.

Red card was extremely harsh, but considering Kipre should've been off anyway for nearly breaking Dembele's leg I'll allow it.

 

about time we got some decisions our way anyway

 

Yes it was soft, and the red card was harsh, but * it, as they say they even themselves out

Get it right up the haters.

 

Soft as * and I'd be raging if it was given against us but after all the * we've had from refs in the past I'll take it and say cheers!

 

Can't defend what Sinclair did as I despise that element of the modern game. I think we can expect a 2 or 3 game ban.

 

Already said no contact from compliance officer! Close the book get on with supporting team in another vital match on Wednesday! HH

 

I see Motherwell haven’t even bothered to appeal the boy’s red card.. tells you all you need to know really.

 

But would you defend Robert Snodgrass if he went down v Ireland or some other international team?