LGBTQ rights.

And children that grow up in single-parent homes statistically face greater difficulties compared to those raised by two opposite-* parents. Furthermore, a child raised in a single-parent home will often seek someone to fulfill the role that their absent parent would normally fill, not to mention they will have a ton of questions about that parent, and their absence will have drastic consequences for that person and their identity throughout their entire life. It's like a boy that is raised by a single-mother. If the father abandoned the family, the boy will face struggles with resentment and self-blame, and will seek a male role model outside of the home to facilitate for what his absent-father will not do, and what his mother cannot do. A mother cannot be a father, and a father cannot be a mother. They are two distinct roles and they both have two distinct influences upon their children's development.

So again the question is, which one isn't needed? Homosexual parenting is not the result of death or a parent leaving. It is an artificial environment that children are placed in. It is a social experiment. It is purposely constructed to deprive children of one of their opposite-* parental roles. So which role is unnecessary, a mother or a father?

 

That is such BULLSHIT.

WHERE is ANYONE suggesting that one parent is dispensable, or MORE important (biologically) than the other? No one.

You wanna believe that same-* couples don't deserve to adopt or have children? That's cool. I thoroughly respect your opinion.

That said, it's immensely misguided ... and PROVEN to be wrong in THOUSANDS of loving same-* households, all around the world.

Two parents of the same * have PROVEN they can LOVE and cherish a child just as much as a heterosexual couple.

 

Yes, I am.

 

You put people on ignore and the posts still get through

 

An artificial environment?!

That is so bogus.

My *.

I dare you to say to that a loving same-* couple with a healthy family.

 

If anything i wish it was 90 percent gay guys in glasgow so I had half a chance at pulling a bird on tinder, but anyway were all equal no need to hate

 

He doesn't really have one.

He's being disgusting and stupid.

 

North is of the classic European Roman Catholic variety.

Backwards, anti-progressive, stale, insular.

MOST North American Roman Catholics (like me) are MUCH more liberal in accepting same-* couples.

Thankfully.

 

Ok I'm starting to think this thread is about to get real bad real quick.

Please don't






















































































































































































































































































If it does I will crash the site with the Pukki gif you swines :icon_mrgreen:

 

If everyone was gay except for me I probably still couldn't get laid.

 

Calm down, dear.

Homosexual parenting is an artificially created environment in which children are placed. A homosexual environment means that there will not be an opposite-* parent. So homosexual parenting necessarily implies that one of the opposite * is unnecessary for the healthy mental and emotional development of children, because it involves artificially removing the influence of the opposite-* parent.

I am sorry, but I don't consider studies that rely upon self-reporting from middle class white lesbians as being scientifically sound. And that is what the majority of so-called proof amounts to. Disregarding the complete unreliability of self-reporting, I don't think white, middle-class lesbians are representative of the homosexual community. And to top it all off, most studies are using controlled sample sizes of bellow 100 people. Proven? * sake mate, get a grip.

It's never about the child though, is it? "We LOVE him/her!" It's all about the parents. Their desires, their views, their opinions. I don't doubt for a second that homosexual parents love their children. But it has to be simply stated that love isn't enough. A homosexual parenting couple are fundamentally deriving a child of something essential to their emotional and mental development. And they're doing it on purpose.

 

That's a strong statement, not sure how accurately that can be applied to everyone.

Nonetheless I don't think the * or sexuality of the parents is important for the development of a child. If you're interested in what is important I'll refer you to Maslow's hierarchy of needs.



Considering the lack of people adopting in the UK, do you think a child would have a better life if they were to remain in an adoption center until they were 18? Would they get the feelings of family, intimacy and belonging that Maslow suggests is important?

 

Well unless you would be happy taking it up the pooper

 

* off you cretin oaf you.






:icon_mrgreen:

 

French Canadians are off their nut man.

 

You tell them mate

 

Well I was going to offer my * but not anymore.

 

ryan im ready for dooing you ya wee cant see me *

 

Huh? It is about the child, actually. GOOD parenting has NOTHING to do with one's sexuality. How would you know what is going on in that family, or this family? There is COUNTLESS loving same-* couples who've nurtured and developed perfectly healthy children.