Lennon to face 17 game ban?

SFA and Celtic are due to release statements; could be interesting but I see the club just talking about getting the right result. Nae league ban, these SFA * must be fuming.

On a more serious note when are these * going to stop lying.

 

So let me get this right - Lennon, as he said, never swore at the ref during the tunnel incident with Murray and his report reflects this yet he was STILL sent to the stands?! For what?! Having a calm talk to him about why Cha got sent off etc?

Whole thing * reeks more than 6 month old stilton!

 

Another SFA cover up..... well well well.

Paranoia eh. * THE SFA, really hope we go through these * big style.

 

Will He Conquer

Eh, naw ya cheating hun *, Lenny will!

 

We know that heads should roll, and folk should walk. But I have my doubts it will happen.

Just how many times will we (Celtic) get lied to by the SFA?
How many times will the officials fabricate stories to get our manager into trouble?
How many times will they lie give "dubious, honest mistake" decisions against us in important games?

Seems in the last 2 seasons Celtic have proved again and again that there has been severe wrong doing against our club, yet it get's laughed at like "ah well, that's just the way of walk up here".

It is disgusting.

 

2 game ban

http://sport.stv.tv/football/scotti...-lennon-hit-with-two-game-ban-by-scottish-fa/

 

If Conquers found to have lied about this, it could mean Stokes gets off on the other one too.

 

So it would seem that Lennon knew exactly what he was doing when confronting Norris on the pitch at Hampden, as if he waited till they went down the tunnel who knows what lies they would have put in the match report.

 

So we can't appeal it and he misses the huns game next weekend, paranoia timmy?

 

What's even more disgusting is that there is a section of our own fans thinking that Lennon is the "embarrassment" in all of this. Will they still think this now that it's coming out about yet more conflicting reports from the officials?

Will still put it down to paranoia on our point of view though no doubt even after all of this.

 

The case against Stokes will never result in him being guilty - Celtic can win the case based on Conquer's previous alone.

 

So we can't appeal it and he misses the huns game next weekend, paranoia timmy?

 

Iain Brines is a police officer, if he'd been found guilty of lying here he'd lose his job in the police. You can put your house on it being Billy Conquer being the one that's fabricated it.

 

Iain Brines is a police officer, if he'd been found guilty of lying here he'd lose his job in the police. You can put your house on it being Billy Conquer being the one that's fabricated it.

 

He will; Celtic will base their case around the premise that Conquer has previous for lying about tunnel incidents...

 

So we can't appeal it and he misses the huns game next weekend, paranoia timmy?

 

SFA on Lennon at Ibrox: "Tribunal imposed no further sanction on the basis that half-game served outwith the technical area was sufficient"

Talk about trying to cover your arses.

 

think celtic will take this all the way and get one of those * the sack possibly even 2 of them

 

Grant Russell ‏ @STVGrant
SFA on Lennon at Ibrox: "Tribunal imposed no further sanction on the basis that half-game served outwith the technical area was sufficient"

 

He will; Celtic will base their case around the premise that Conquer has previous for lying about tunnel incidents...