Kris Commons

He plays him on the left wing, what more do you want? The boy is a stone cold ball playing central midfielder. Sending him down a division is also a sackable offense. We will actually laugh about this in years to come when we look back at how this joker treated our future captain. he was good for 20 games this season for us and this clown has him playing in the first division. Shocking.

 

He has played him out left, as he isn't better than Brown or Bitton. In fact, was it not you saying yesterday that players shouldn't be picked if they aren't better than others available, regardless of current form basically. So where would Henderson fit into your team then? Is he dislodging Brown or Bitton to get a a game? Or would he not be getting a game in your team either?

 

Henderson is good enough to be used in rotation so that either Brown or Bitton can get a rest in domestic games, * me they look like they need it. Stop trying to catch me out. Everything I say is logical and in the best interests of our club.

 

He plays in the attacking roles for Scotland as well, it's not ridiculous to just move him across one as he's a threat going forward. For all the thing's to dig at Ronny for today, you pick this pish? Could he have stayed? Possibly. Would he be playing every week? No chance. Is he playing every week and an integral part of a decent Hibs team? Absolutely..

I too think he'll eventually develop in to an all round box to box midfielder but he's still developing and finding his self. I can think of worse management calls than putting a young midfielder in midfield, out wide. His new team mate, Dylan McGeough, ring any bell's? Lenny sticking him in at right back..

 

Dont you interact with me on this site after the * you pulled a few days ago.

 

What *?

 

He would rarely get a game. Going by your theory, he wouldn't ever if Brown & Bitton were fit. In fact, Johansen & Armstrong can play in the middle of the park as well, so there is another two added to the list that he would be behind. See, I'm now doing what you do with Rogic and the number 10 role. So Henderson would be 5th choice, and since all the others are better players just now, they should start ahead of him going by what you say normally. So why not send him out on loan to gain first team experience? In fact, I think it would have been stupid to keep him just now, when it looked like playing regular games was exactly what he needed. Which he is doing at Hibs, and will come back a better player for it.

 

Im no tout but you know what ye did, now * off.

 

Commons is our best player imo.. Coudnt get a game for a while and shows a lot of commitment and emotion for the cause.

 

You petty little man. I genuinely have no clue what your on about, enlighten me?

 

Henderson was dropped for hibs biggest game of the season so far? And came on at 75mins.. I know a few hibs fans who claim he isn't good enough to start for them... Behind McGeouch McGinn fyve and Bartley.

 

Bitton hasnt signed a new contract. He could be away as early as January. We should have been integrating Liam into the team this season. Rogic is a poor player and has no use to us other than backup.

 

Petty * you. Remember that the next time you imply someones a hun.

 

Bitton might be here after January though. Or are we now just assuming he was leaving as it suits your agenda. We have another 4 players who are better than Henderson just now. Surely they must start ahead of Henderson? That's what you have been preaching previously about other players and positions. Look, you are backtracking, and now you are having to contradict what you have said before to try and feel justified here. Just hold your hands up and admit you have made an * of yourself here.

 

Show me where I implied that? I'm waiting

 

I'll do no such thing. Henderson is good enough to get games in the middle of the park for us. Not as a starter nor should he start in front of better players. I am not advocating shoehoring him into the side over more deserving players like the in the case of Tom Rogic. Why is this so hard to understand?

 

I dont have to prove anything but the last I checked your implications were written in a thread and on my public profile. That is if you had the stones to keep them up. It wouldnt surprise me if you edited or took down the information. as you didnt have the balls to call me a hun outright. But if you call someone a Walter Smith then I think that implication is crystal clear.

 

So when would he get a game? Bitton, Brown, Johansen, Armstrong and possibly Allan are all more accomplished players just now. Would it not be shoehorning him into the team if he played ahead of these players? So is it not the right thing to do sending him out on loan to gain first team experience with that in mind?

 

And Cadete. Although tbf he thinks every * is a left winger.