A Bit Of Prison Justice...

You're saying that "citizens cannot assume the right..." and I'm saying that in a perfect world it would be that way but it's not - it's prison.

Maybe their motive was that they didn't give a * about child murderers and was doing the world a favour by getting rid of the sick *. Who knows, and how the * am I supposed to know what they were in for? I'm having a guess, though, that they aren't in for brutally beating their two-year-old to death, causing 107 injuries, locking her in an unlit cupboard because she was afraid of the dark so was "disciplining" her, or putting her into a tumble drier then being dumped in a bin for their own sick amusement.

You keep preaching on about "the state" and "citizens can't assume the right" but we're talking about prison here and something tells me that prisoner's don't give a * whether it should only be the state than can decide someone's fate or not. If prisoners want to kill a child killer in prison then you'll receive very little sympathy from me about the matter. And probably very little sympathy from a lot of other people too.

Aren't you the one, by the way, that wanted some prisoner's sentences possibly quashed just because they weren't given halal meat? Seems like you defend criminals more than their victims.

 

You're most certainly not in that prison for a minor offence. So I'll be interested to hear what they themselves are in for.

It doesn't matter what the prisoners think. You seem to think I hold sympathy for this case, which I don't.

Seems you like to embrace murder

 

This thread = yawn

 

Not really the correct attitude tbh.

 

Too scared to comment incase i get a ban so wont be replying after this as ill get in a war of words... he deserved everything he got, and much much worse. We need a much bigger deterrent in this country than a nice cell, gym, exercise and loads of food. Death, hangings, public executions, torture. *, steal something loose your hand.

 

Maybe you should campaign for the Shariah for 'UK' movement.

 

this man deserved exactly what he got. absolutely disgusting and the world and society is better off without him. monster.

 

Of course he deserved pain and retribution......but that still does not mean we should allow or tolerate vigilantes does it?Im pretty sure we would all like a kick at him, but it cant be allowed.
Emotions cant come into it, or the whole system will break down.

 

In general? No. In this case? Yes. I see nothing wrong with the double standard, nothing in the world is black and white. I have no problem tolerating or allowing these vigilantes. It's not about emotions, it's about the punishment fitting the crime. In this case the punishment was probably easy compared to the crime.

 

So how should we now react?Reward them or punish them?

 

That is a good point, i have no sympathy for the man but it would set a dangerous precedent if murders went unpunished in prison.

 

Oh they'll get punished... Rightly so. Do they care? Probably not.. They were probably away for life anyway, considering the fact they went and done it.

As long as he suffered before his death, these men done the right thing! Well done to them I say!

 

neither. slap of the wrist.

 

Where is the line drawn though? should all murderers suffer the same fate in prison? It's a dangerous line of thought

 

Well done to inmates in a high security unit...

Righto.

Hoorah for murderers, it's not like they did anything morally reprehensible themselves or anything, they're perfectly entitled to dish out punishment to nonces and feel morally superior.

 

So if you're line of thought was actually to hold some footing in the system... A blood thirsty murderer could fulfil their quest by killing a nonce and get away with it?

 

Why does it matter to you so much what they did?

 

Morally... this is correct. You couldn't work this in a civillised society tho.

 

We're all discussing this as if his murder was due to his conviction offence when there's actually a very fair chance that it was committed due to a prison debt, general falling out, or retaliation for something that he did or didn't do in the pokey.

As I said before, I have no sympathy for him. Hope he suffered.

I believe we should have a legitimate death penalty in place for such creatures. It would save on occurrences like this!

All that said, don't kid yourselves that there is a moral code of conduct amongst prisoners... in most jail wings there isn't (and particularly not in the type of wing where this * was caged - it would be full of similarly nasty fucktards).

 

You're right, people don't have the right to kill. But on the flip side, some people deserve suffering and death. So whilst the perpetrators were in the wrong with regards to THEIR actions, the 'victim' DESERVED what happened to him. Antinomy - or a type of paradox.