Ref wrong to rule out Dons 'goal'

BBC SPORT | Football | Scottish Premier | Ref wrong to rule out Dons 'goal'

Referee Iain Brines has admitted he wrongly disallowed the goal which could have finished Celtic's title challenge.

Is this guy a comlete hun or what? What about Samaras's goal that was perfectly legit??

 

Another example why NOT to have camera technology

 

It was unfairly chopped off but the thing that bothers me is that none of the reports mention Samaras goal that was disallowed minutes earlier, I still don't know what it was chopped off for

 

It was about time we got a bit of good luck and that aberdeen goal being choped of was the good luck.

 

ye it was harsh to rule it out but the whistle had gone and as brines even says the celtic defence had stopped. yet no mention anywhere of samaras' a few minutes previous. on that note aparantly scotsport last night never showed or mentioned either of the two samaras goals which seemed strange to say the least

 

The majority of players reacted to the whistle by stopping - the exception being Diamond who placed the ball into the Celtic goal.

It is clear that the goal should not have been disallowed."

How can any "goal" be allowed if play has stopped?

It wasn't hand ball but the throw leading to it was ours as well i thought

 

with the goal chopped off and the sitter aberdeen missed, and the poor performance ,sounds like we were fortunate to get the win,,


thank * the huns are worse than us ,"cup semi",,,rangers were so bad,,it looks like we will beat them again at the weekend

 

is it normal for a ref to come out with admiting he made a mistake?

 

If that mistake doesn't benefit Rangers then yes.

 

Bollix to that Mason. If he had done his job properly it would have been 3-1.

 

It was K.Clark mate and yeh he did actually come out and admit he got it wrong

 

the ref might have said this to * off the rangers by saying i made a mistake ,and if i dident u could have won the leauge,,

so get it up yeh,,lol

 

hehe i like that idea!

 

thats so true, if the players hadnt reacted to the whistle and stopped, theres every chance he wouldnt have managed to get it in the back of the net anyway....

 

nope, he was right. it was a goal. it should have stood.

 

The main point of this isnt whether or not Aberdeen should or should not have had a goal.

Its the fact that the media and that * brines have just completely ignored the fact that celtic had 2 legitimate goals chopped off and there is no mention of it anywhere!

We were pish on saturday, but had the referee had done his job properly it would have been 3-0 going into the last few minutes.

Why the * did Brines, the * * that he is, ONLY come out and say he was wrong to disallow aberdeen a goal and not celtics? He is a * mason, thats why!!

 

its about time we got a decision going are way

 

FFS why ain't there no mention of Sammy's disallowed yet legitimate goal minutes before Diamond's? * the media, * Brines