Honest Mistakes Thread 2016/17 onwards.

The product's faulty, don't pay the money / claim a refund.

 

We are paying money to be cheated.. couldn't make it up

 

£100,000 or I think more per year, for arguably a worse standard of refereeing than we were already getting. That's money that could have been donated to the foundation

 

That system would require our officials to be able to string a coherent sentence together, which I suspect is a bridge too far.

Agree, the way rugby use the system is excellent, and you at least understand the officials' thought process, even if you might not agree with the outcome.

 

It goes further than just us I’ve noticed the teams that are just on the coattails of rangers in the table the refs have been dubious in those games aswell I seen that eve with out var showing it up


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

It’s not faulty it works fine the problem is the people behind the screen


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

Tells you all you need to know about the * in charge of our game.

 

That statement is * laughable.

 

I cannot believe I'm saying this, but I agree with fat boy boyd in the Scottish Hun. Even he thinks the whole thing surrounding Jota and the leg breaker on Starfelt is beyond embarrassing.

 

Personally I think the club needs to keep gathering evidence and then take legal action against the sfa on the matter.

Up until now we've been accused of paranoia. The good news is that now we can use their own "evidence" against them.

 

"Just say it's affside cos it's Sellik..."?

 

"Red red red"

"But he's only offside.."

"Red red red"

 

Scary thing is, that's exactly what would happen.

 

Good thread this. The guy explains it well and how they're lying..

 

Two things will either happen today in the games they will either get their act together and officiate fairly …. Or stick the fingers up and double down on the cheating


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

My two pence worth for today I’m disappointed var has turned out the way it has I thought it was gonna change things put refs under the microscope I was naive I can count on only two known refs in our league who I believe are not bias and just incompetent Clancy and collum I believed var would improve these two as they can be good on their day we seen this with the first var game I thought Clancy refereed it perfectly because he had the var to fall on all was looking rosy then cam shattering back down to earth the last 3 weeks and answer is their for us even if we have Clancy or collum ref our games which normally would happen without var we now lose that fair aspect as the orc refs in Beaton muir Davidson walsh McLean Dallas get a chance to influence the game behind screen what’s more galling is we can possibly have and orange double act now where one of them is onfield and one of them is behind the screen


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

If there are (minimum) 6 cameras at every game, surely 3 are in each half? Are we to believe all 3 for Jotas goal are compromised?

My theory is the cameras were working perfectly but they decided to cheat us out of the goal and give the ridiculous angle thinking we wouldn’t take it further.
Now we have asked for clarification they’ve shat the bed and came out with that ludicrous statement of Jota being offside when he “received” the ball, so as to look incompetent rather than cheating.

 

Cheating *. Make them irrelevant and as ssud on here more shots outside the box too so var isnt needed wunderVAR.COYBIG HH