koki or naka vs huns?

To much of a gamble, when we are 3 up he can come on

 

comes on and gets the 4th and sets up the 5th. what a game it would be.:icon_mrgreen:

 

Aye let's get rid of our best players..."always reported missing" in Hun matches my *

 

I'm not wanting rid of him, but name 1 Old Firm were he played well and influenced it?

 

YouTube - Nakamura Vs Rangers

2-0 in the CIS he was outstanding,set up Magic's goal at Ibrox too..
That argument of hides,no dig is perpetuated by the likes of Keevins and it's silly.People listen to the media too much instead of using their own eyes
The above is a compilation of his stuff agin the Huns for all the he hides,never tackles,goes missing brigade

 

This thread is a ridiculous question to be honest.

Were you saying Robson or Naka or even Riordan or Naka you just might and I mean JUST might have a point. Mizuno or Naka is * ridiculous though. Are you serious?

 

Throw him on with 10 mins to go..
let him soak up the atmosphere,
it'll be good for him.

 

dont understand why WGS didn't give mizuno a run out on sunday. we were coasting it and i'm dying to see him play

 

'our best players.' i wouldn't put naka in that bracket any more. past his best in MY eyes. sorry, your right, after watching that clip. the clip was 6mins long and showed 3 or 4 old firms. he has only played well for 6mins in, at least, 270mins of old firm action! he has only reported for duty in ONE old firm game. i remind you thats ONE out of how many has he featured in?

 

agree'd.
no one has actually see him play an spl game to judge how he can handle it and people want him flung in the deepend? c'mon lads...

 

i posted that a while ago and got this as a repsonce "those were years ago" fact is though, he's been claimed to do NOTHING in oldfirm games since he got here. clearly though, he does. he just hasn't scored in one or run past a ton of players, which he never does because he's slow.

i'll never forget the kamakazi on rikson though in the cis

although it was an own goal, naka pretty much scored the 2nd goal

 

Put Koki on the bench... Actually how old is Koki? does he apply for the u21 rule?

Put him on in the last 15 minutes if you're controlling the game... This game is far too important to have him on from the start.

 

he's 23 in september. does the under 21 rule still apply?

 

He's 23? I thought he was about 20!

Nah it won't apply unless he was 21, only expection is for 22 year olds who were 21 when the season started or when they transfered to the club.

 

How many Old Firms has he played? How many assist & goals in those games?

 

Remind me all ye want...The clip is just that, a clip..If you want a video that shows every minute of every Hun game he's played in,ye can make your own.If you think we are better without him look at our games in December when he was nae playing.. I can't understand why anyone would want our 'footballing' players out of the team. At a time when fans are complaining about a lack of entertainment, we should be getting rid of one of the 2 entertaining players we have at the club.Perhaps it is time for him to go. He's clearly not appreciated by some.

The same people who bemoan a lack of quality are suggesting one of our best players, arguably best technical player leave the club.At the moment Naka is the only guy in our team who can be trusted to retain possession - I include McGeady in this assessment, he's an old fashioned dribbler who takes chances against full backs and will lose the ball on occasion.

The fact that you cannot see what he contributes to the team and would happily sell him in the hope that an unknown wee guy that nobody has seen play a first team game will step in and replace him is nonsensical.
We must be a far better team than i've been watching this season if we can even contemplate selling Nakamura. The problem isn't Naka it's the people around him,I canna mind Lubo winning too many tackles but he didn't have to because of the intelligent midfielders players around him

 

i think you need to sit down after comparing naka and lubo. but if we had it your way we would have naka until hes 51. he is now over the hill. i do think we are better without him in a game like this. against far weaker opposition, naka is great. he did sweet f.a in the CL this year.
i don't care about 'entertainment value' i care about points! and i have heard no calls for beautiful football, apart from the media claiming thats what we want. i don't care if we play ugly all next year and win the league on goal difference.
hartley retains the ball better than naka has done this season.
by the way, i never asked for a clip of all naka's OF's. i just stated out of 270mins playing time he has only performed in 6 mins of it.

 

goals 0 assits 2 i think.
how many has mcgeady got?

 

O sweet heart of jesus...Where did i compare Naka and Lubo??
Yes i'd have him till he's 51.If your just gonna make stuff up what 's the point...Where do ye sit in Parkhead if ye have'nt heard fans complain about our football??Sweet fa in the CL this year eh?Missed a good bit thru injury,but set up McManus agin Milan, Good agin Spartak away set up chances for the team and himself,,only player we had on the pitch in the Nou Camp who looked like he belonged there.
Over the hill at 29???...But you'd play Mizuno so we'll have to agree to differ

 

yes sir we will lol