Ki is a Liability

I read it like 2 or 3 days ago, stuck in mind. But there you go, he ho.

Think Ki could be a big player for us next season in Europe, and can see him only improving the more games he gets in the SPL. Look how much he's improved since he started. Put faith in him and I can see him repaying it big time.

 

Ki should not be competing for place with Kayal. They should both play.

 

your engrish is better than mine m8. top post

 

Fair enough lad.

I hope you are right and he does turn out to be an influential player for us, but I don't see this happening.

 

Not in a Celtic jersey anyway, that's for sure.

Folk keep on banging on about Ledley ? Ledley's been very good recently, having more of an impact than Ki ever has done in a Celtic jersey.

 

The whole team were poor today, we let Motherwell kick us off the park, maybe because we have two big hun games ahead in the next 2 weeks and players didn't want to pick up any injuries and miss out on them. Not Ki's fault but I do think we missed Kayal badly today.

 

thats the weird thing about the spl tho, altho its * quality, a player like ki (or crosas) would do better in spain or italy, even tho they are much higher levels of football, the reason being, more time on the ball, more space to pass into cause your not constantly playing infrolnt of 9,10,11 opposition and good surfaces, the spl is no walk in the park

 

i really rate ki and i think most of yous are being very harsh on him. today was the only game i can remember when he had a really bad game. as long as he doesnt perform like that again then he could be a starte for us ahead of ledley. his passes to hooper and stokes can be world class and the difference between us winning and losing a game. i think he is the best passer of the ball in the team, his problem is that he dilly dallies about too much, which can be sorted.

 

sammy's another good example. think he'd do much better in spain or italy where you get 3 or 4 secs on the ball before you need to get rid. he doesn't have a quick enough instinct for scotland

 

yeah sammy too, he is a brilliant player for a counter attack, or as a lone striker, unfortunately, we dont have to do/play either alot of the time in the spl

 

Because realistically, it's a fight between Ki and Ledley fo the 2nd spot in midfield. Kayal's an automatic choice for all of us.

What can Ledley do that Ki can't?

 

Ledley actually has a heart for starters.

 

but really he hasnt got much over ki, nothing in an attacking sense actually, ki passes forwrd better and shots better, even hits a set peice better, on the other hand ledley is better off the ball, but with kayal beside him, ki could thrive

 

Good points mate, Ki has big potential imo.

Just out of curiosity without going

Why and when did you start supporting Celtic?

Just out of curiosity chara, tell me to * off if you think I am being a nosy bollix like.

 

Right time for me to step in and say firstly, this thread is about as ludicrous as celtics performance today, are you really trying to say that the reason we lost today and drew a few games pre december was because Ki was playing? That is absolutely absurd to the point of complete sheer ignorance.

Do you just when analyzing celtic just happen to forget about the 10 other players on the pitch simply because you have a personal vendetta against Ki which is about as obvious as a * being in a brothel. Ridiculous. The entire team was absolutely terrible today it was a woeful performance your saviors Brown and ledley were even worse than Ki today, super Hooper worth 35M was absolute garbage, Mulgrew and our bale like Izzy were also pretty terrible today but wait... who is getting the abuse its ... oh my word its Ki and for what reason... simply because he took the position that kayal had.

If we go by your logic padmill and Dr.V then there should currently be 11 threads open with every single players name and is a liability next to it. I cannot honestly believe this thread is up.

 

Whats that padmill got nothing to say ? Are you pointing out weird faces because you have simply no coherent argument to back up any of your claims... i think so.