1. Having trouble logging in by clicking the link at the top right of the page? Click here to be taken to the log in page.
    Dismiss Notice

Post Match Analysis ,rangers v Celtic.

Discussion in 'Celtic Chat' started by kennydal, Feb 28, 2010.

  1. bollocks, respectfully. we where 2 on 1 on the wing whae Ngeumo an bra-hied in the first half an ngemo let us doon whae an easy baw and we hud a great counter at the start of the 2nd, 3 on 2, negumo had an easy baw to release fortune and * up big style, hesitating.
     
  2. Do you n believe in FACTS? We managed ZERO corners in the full game-in a must win game!!!

    And yet yr huvin a pop at N'guemo?? He was our best player apart from Boruc IMO.

    Get a grip.:47:
     
  3. * game, * result, league is over, Mowbray is to blame.

    That's my summary.
     
  4. Tell me about it. Thought also Keane started the match on fire till Boughera nearly broke is ankle. Even then his lay offs where superb. Thought Fortune kept on going to the right wing for * all, but was timing his runs well
     
  5. he had some vile moments but overall i thought he was pretty good. i'd give him a 6
     
  6. bang on :54:
     
    did a say he had a bad game? NO. I said he lacked composure whe it was needed? Yes. Do you disagree with the examples i said?

    when you say IMMENSE, ie flawless, well, thats bollcks cos he was far from perfect, but yet he was one of our better players

    the reason i mentioned him is because if he got those simple passes right we would have had goal scoing oppurtunities

    best players 1) Hinkel 2) Boruc 3) O Dea 4) Ngemo

    Calm down m8, a couldnae gie a * aboot corners
     
    #307 Chu the tim, Feb 28, 2010
    Last edited by a moderator: Feb 28, 2010
  7. Im not anti-keane nor anti-irish as you suggest. it just really annoys me that the Irish players tend to get away with the brunt of the stick. im not the only person to have noticed this.

    what makes you think im anti-keane? cause im criticizing? 50% of the people on here must be anti-celtic then cause all they do is criticize the celtic team.

    perhaps yes my problem is that he is earning at least twice as much as our next highest earner. not only must this undermine the rest of the players but the fact that he gets an automatic start after missing a week of training and then left on for the 90 mins. if it had been larrson or sutton or someone that was scoring week in week out then yes through him in.

    as someone said its his wages not his performance that are keeping him on the park.
     
  8. * result- the turning point was that prik laugherty again!

    Holy goalie had his best game for a long time.

    Moving onto Falkirk-

    * the huns!!!!!!!
     
  9. maybe his CV has something to say for it. he hasn't been paid these wages, nor played in the EPL for years because of nothing. on his game, he's a creative forward that can manufacture goals. you can't say that about anyone else we have available. he didn't train so he could get proper rest for the knock he picked up. i don't have a problem with it. we're a better team with him on the pitch than without him. he didn't have his best game today but you're overdoing this argument just a touch m8. tbf, the deliveries he got were total *. lionel * messi wouldn't have scored with these delivery coming from MF + getting your legs kicked off studs up by the huns all feckin days. ffs man.

    would you at least agree that kamara was * today?
     
  10. Lay off Keane and Fortune. The problem today was that the midfield were no good at a getting a grip of the game and therefore supplying the frontmen. N'Guemo had too much to do as Brown was too peripheral and McGeady was ill! I thought the two front men looked up for it in the first half but could do nothing about the dire midfield performance in the second half. Mowbray frustrates me with his refusal to play Rasmussason and Samaras baffles me. Ki, if you watch carefully invariably finds his man with his passes but his is not a strong enough character, having delivered one of the few good second half balls into the box he should have told Braaheid to gtf at the free kick that was booted out of play. Thompson was a bit shaky in the first half but looks a good prospect while Rogne looks a real find, i thought Hinkel had one of his best defensive games but we never saw him touch the ball in the rangers half.
     
  11. What do you think about Rogne today?

    How bad is his injury?
     
  12. He has a good head on him and a no nonsense attitude to the game ,a good player ,shame he had to leave the park ,i dont know the source of his injury.
     
  13. hope it's not too serious. kid has more composure than gary caldwell on anesthesia
     
  14. heh????????:97:
     
  15. The thing that really got me me was their goal. Into the second min of injury time and I think O'Dea needlessly gave them a corner. The referee was to blame for sending off Brown and so was the midfield for being non-existent, but I can't understand why people are not analysing the poor defending at the goal as we were a min away from getting a point which would have still left us with a glimer of hope.
     
  16. We didn't do nearly enough to win the game, * refereeing or not:47:. 2010/11 is what we need to be realistic & focus on now - unless the filthy hun * totally * their pants or go bust :celt_2:
    <!-- / message --><!-- sig -->
     
  17. Just back from the game (well not really, just back from the pub after the game) and can't begin to vent my anger (ref, support, team, manager ect...) so will leave it for now.
     
    #318 Quigley 13, Feb 28, 2010
    Last edited by a moderator: Feb 28, 2010
  18. support? elaborate...
     
  19. Phone * Just Joan :bbpd:
     
iHax Community