Danny Ings

A stinky source.

 

Only way he'd come here is on a loan deal, no way would we pay what he would cost in a perm deal.

Don't get me wrong, keep this lad fit and he'd do well up here, but injuries are a concern here he must have only took part in 5-10 games last season.

This is my heart and head are contradicting each other, like I would be well up for signing him but it's just the injury risk is off putting.

 

I'd take him on a loan.

Like others have said though - too injury prone.

IF we are going to sign another striker I want it to be a young player who will be happy to play 3rd choice.
And someone who can play football unlike our No7

 

Rumours are dead to me

 

He's * atrocious on the huns aswell if not worse.

He knows absolutley nothing and this is one of the worst yet

 

I wouldn't say that, he's been spot on with a * of a lot of his Rangers and Sevco stuff and it's clear he has a source inside the shitpit.

 

* the rumours

 

Ings = Cascarino = a.Balde = Murphy = Scepovic = no very guid....
On a high salary and injury prone to boot
Don't touch this one Brendan!

 

He definitely had them squirming over his freedom of information enquiry about the roofs, he also has a mole in the * pit as he knew about them needing soft loans to see out last season, and it's already started this season. Far too many of our own fans have issues with this guy, he is digging up stuff the MSM should be getting hold of ffs.

 

Celtic have emerged as second favourites to sign Liverpool's Danny Ings this summer.
Ings was signed by Celtic boss Brendan Rodgers two years ago, but has suffered two serious injuries in the meantime, limiting his action at Anfield.
http://www.hitc.com/en-gb/2017/08/1...ond-favourites-to-sign-liverpools-danny-ings/

 

He does yes have a man on the inside of an organisation that's employees have been purged annually with board change after board change for the last few years.

Did well in the liquidation times no doubt and fans lapping up his hun related stuff doesn't bother me too much but id prefer if he stayed the hun investigator thing he is and never mentioned us because he has absolutely nothing on us. He knows no more than you and I. He is no different to the rest of the people on Twitter looking for cheap retweets and favs.

 

I think most people have issue with the fact that 90-95% of what he writes is about rangers and the other 5% is about us

All it would take for a rangers fan to justify their claim that we are "obsessed" with them, is for them to point to Phil mac. At that stage you'd just have to say yeah, fair enough

 

Those * should be banned as a source, * all but click bait.

 

He has no one in that place ,pure guesswork at this point. It's highly highly unlikely any such employee would have lasted this long

 

Well a lot of * on here spend their time in the monkeys thread, but who am I to judge.

 

Mate he's a freelance journalist, author and playwright. I seriously doubt he gives a flying * about retweets and favs.

 

Do you even read any of it, as I said he has had them squirming over various issues. Tell me what do you find he has been wrong about off the top of your head?

 

That doesn't take away from the fact hes no different to those that do

 

You don't come out with the sort of information he has without having someone on the inside. Even Dodgy Dave commented on a boardroom leak pretty much confirming it.