1. Having trouble logging in by clicking the link at the top right of the page? Click here to be taken to the log in page.
    Dismiss Notice

Would you rather?

Discussion in 'Celtic Chat' started by JrOhara2, Mar 7, 2010.

  1. Mick the Tick

    Mick the Tick

    Messages:
    213
    20? Keane should at least be on 35 goals a year in this league
     
  2. P R D

    P R D

    Messages:
    4,113
    Jock Stein, Kenny Dalglish, Danny McGrain, Paul Lambert and countless others were or are Rangers fans, you braindoner.

    Care to expand on said what said bullshit consits of?

    No one from Celtic is blaming any referee for our league position. That's a fabrication, one you seem oddly eager to beleive in rather than actually examining in the facts.

    It's an established fact that we've been trying to get Keane for some years now. That's one * of a crystal ball the board has, I must say.

    Firstly, we signed the Swedish POTY and one of Norway's best up-and-coming defenders (who already looks to be one of the best players at the club IMO). Secondly, I'd wager you'd never heard the name Ramas until the story broke and have no idea how much "quality" he might actually have.

    The majority of signings completed around Europe are done so on the last day of the transfer window. It's more common than not.
     
  3. Markybhoy

    Markybhoy

    Messages:
    42,074
    I'd rather have Tony Mowbray. One bad season does not make Tony Mowbray a loser, a * or a bad manager. Despite what some people on here might say.

    As for Walter, I've grown to respect the man a lot more than I used to. I used to think he was a poor manager but in all fairness to him he's doing a good job at Rangers. I still don't think he's a great manager or anything particularly special but he's certainly no mug.
     
  4. Well hes definitly the worst celtic manager
     
  5. Markybhoy

    Markybhoy

    Messages:
    42,074
    No he isn't.

    Barnes, Brady or Macari are the candidates for that tag.
     
  6. skidrick

    skidrick

    Messages:
    1,208
    Location:
    Crumlin

    Another lets hate the manager thread. Fck sake how many times does the same shi t have to come up, :38:
     
  7. Markie85

    Markie85

    Messages:
    2,456
    Tony Mowbray all the way.

    These threads are getting daft now.
     
  8. joydivision

    joydivision

    Messages:
    556
    I would take Smith over Mowbray, easy. Never had a problem with Smith and he has always been more professional than a number of our managers over the years. He can win leagues, with a squad worse than ours as well.

    He would never come to us though because he is a legend for the huns. It would be like O'Neil going to Rangers or something, it would trigger the end of the world or something.
     
  9. derrycelts

    derrycelts

    Messages:
    43
    Barnes had a better record than Mowbray after same games played, and we were are a far more entertaining side under Barnes aswell, for all TM's talk of how he's a keen admirer of our history and the beautiful game when exactly are we going to start playing it?
     
  10. Richmal

    Richmal

    Messages:
    0
    Yep..i would take him!..if he is good enough for Tommy Burns..then he is good enough for me!
     
  11. Richmal

    Richmal

    Messages:
    0
    Also, people forget that Barnes LOST Henke to injury during season, and i am sure we were top when he lost him!..barnes is treated unfairly..
     
  12. CMcphail88

    CMcphail88

    Messages:
    3,075
    Location:
    Section 402
    This is spot on :50: yes there is no denying this has been a really bad season, but these things take time. Whole new group of players don't always bring instant success.
     
  13. maldoon2007

    maldoon2007

    Messages:
    484
    Location:
    The Highlands
    As long as the man in charge is leading us to trophies and decent European runs then it does not matter where he is from or where he has been before.
     
  14. Pauli_Andy

    Pauli_Andy

    Messages:
    434
    Spot on, it's rather unfair to compare a manager with a 32 year career with one who's had a six year career.

    As for the general point, of course I'd take a good manager regardless of their background. But I think the majority of managers everywhere would have struggled at Celtic this season.
     
  15. derrycelts

    derrycelts

    Messages:
    43
    Why is that mate?

    O'Neill and even Strachan within a few weeks had us playing to a good standard. Smith the same when he took over an awful huns team, good managers don't seem to need time at the Old Firm. Why is TM such a special case?
     
  16. marccoyne

    marccoyne

    Messages:
    967
    really?? were you there under the WGS era, a lot fans just didn't like him because he 'wasn't Celtic minded' and he brought lots of success

    as for Walter Smith, I have respect for but I wouldn't like him as Celtic boss because the football is awful
     
  17. Markybhoy

    Markybhoy

    Messages:
    42,074
    Barnes had infinitely more talented players to work with than Mowbray does. Even with those players he still made a * of things. The guy wanted us to play a 4-2-2-2 formation ffs!!

    Barnes has also failed dismally at every other managerial job he's been given. Saying Barnes is a better manager than Tony Mowbray is just stupid.
     
  18. paddymcgheesm8

    paddymcgheesm8

    Messages:
    179
    Location:
    partick
    there is too much of a risk with mowbray.he has asked for 4 transfer windows! say we give him it and he doesnt deliver? out mowbray goes,and some other poor * has to come in to pick up the pieces with the huns on their way to 4 in a row! board should have gone with a sound manager with european experience. Bilic wanted a go and i would have been happy with him as he would have attracted some big names.all we will get from mowbray is koreans(brought in by the board to sell shirts) and middle of the road players from the championship.