Tom Daley expecting a baby with his husband

What the *???

 

I would imagine the proportion of Gay people against Gay people having the same rights as heterosexual couples in marriage and adoption would be miniscule.

Sent from my HTC Desire 530 using Tapatalk

 

It's true. And what's more disturbing is that is still happens in some quarters.

They circumcise the kid and the rabbi performing the procedure sucks the remaining blood from the infants genitals.

Look it up... or don't if it makes you sick to your stomach.

 

Every child deserves to be loved and raised in a positive happy environment, if that means they got 1 parent, 2 mums or 2 dads, a mum who's a man, a dad who's a mum, a parent who's gender fluid and associates themselves as a * freezer then do be it.

No child should be denied true happiness with loving parents just because they are not traditionally a man and women.

 

It's so disturbing I was reading it as rabbits, then you mentioned circumcision and saw it was rabbi.

Jesus * that * is messed up.

 

I had absolutely no idea of this, and to be honest I wish I hadn't.

Am I right in saying they are circumcising then with their teeth, and sucking away any blood (hits the boke as typing)???

 

I haven't read extensively about it so I have no idea if they perform the procedure with their teeth. Reading that they suck the blood themselves was plenty of information for me.

 

That is * horrifying.

 

That would be the only rational reason I could have thought for their mouth being near a baby's member, but in actual fact a grown man's mouth being round a baby's * isn't rational whatsoever.

Couldn't give a * if that's religious "tradition" it's just * SICK!

 

* sake. Wish I hadn't read that.

 

* sake lads.......i fear it's gone too far but this thread may yet rise up to the dizzy heights of the gutter!!!!.......at the moment it * well below that!!!

 

No mate, I was talking about surrogates, maybe like what Ronaldo did? As I said, not referring to this case.

Adoption isn’t done purposefully as far as I know. It’s making the best of a bad situation in that case.

 

Ah right. Discussion for a separate thread really, but I can't immediately think of any problem I have with it.

 

Yeah probably a separate thread, unless these guys are using a surrogate rather than adopting, it doesn’t say as far as I can see.

I don’t know how I would feel about it to be honest. If a kid doesn’t have their mother for whatever reason then that’s not great but sadly it does happen.

To actively and purposefully do that - like a dog breeder does with puppies - doesn’t seem right to me, but I don’t have a strong opinion and could be convinced.

Maybe if the mother was still involved in some way?

 

People saying this is against nature. Welcome to 2018. Us flying in airplanes, calling on smartphones, putting the lights on in your house is against nature too. Get a life...who * cares.

 

Same. Just had a deeply disturbing image because of it..

As for this thread, * *....

 

Oh *, i'd read about the rabbi thing before. Blanked it out until reading through this. Boak!

 

Well at least we can tell who has the type of * job that requires them to undergo "diversity training" judging by some of the twisted * Im reading on here, with the obvious exception of the well known wasters that is.

 

Sounds like you could do with a full course on that stuff.

 

I suppose that would be true if you subscribe to cultural marxism or a fan of the work of The Frankfurt School