Main hun a convicted killer

[buckfastceltic]

Originally Posted by Aiden_McGeady

I'm 16 years old, I'm not anything.

You're out of your depths with this argument though. How would you feel if it was your brother or son who he stabbed to death, and then seeing him out causing more trouble and acting as a "central figure" in rioting.

A changed man? Not exactly...

Good point as it was my wee sisters b/f`s uncle who was the victim and his mum is in bits at seeing this scumbag protesting his innocence in all these papers today. She is the victim of this fucker today. Also he is a good friend of mine now and the hatred of this scummy cunt in him is gettin on the verge of wanting to go knock the shit outa him, but as he one of the decent ppl he knows he`s not worth it.

[Aiden_McGeady]

His quotes from the incident say it all... this man is a scumbag.

[Martin]

Originally Posted by Aiden_McGeady

I'm 16 years old, I'm not anything.

You're out of your depths with this argument though. How would you feel if it was your brother or son who he stabbed to death, and then seeing him out causing more trouble and acting as a "central figure" in rioting.

A changed man? Not exactly...

You have no proof that he was a central figure in the rioting. You are making a judgement without sufficient evidence. i.e. you are PRE-judging, i.e. you are showing prejudice

I'm out of my depth ?

Go back to the start of the thread and read it all again. Sorry but I think I'm doing rather well so far !

[Martin]

Originally Posted by Aiden_McGeady

Also, you seem to be avoiding anything that disproves what you say, like with this post ^.

Weak argument mate.

You haven't disproved anything I have said.

[Aiden_McGeady]

The Record, who have seen many videos of his involvement (read the whole article again) specifically quoted that he was "a central figure" in the videos.

I think that's sufficient.

[Aiden_McGeady]

Originally Posted by Martin

You haven't disproved anything I have said.

You say there's a lack of evidence... I give you evidence... you start talking about political parties, ignoring what I said.

[Martin]

Originally Posted by Aiden_McGeady

The Record, who have seen many videos of his involvement (read the whole article again) specifically quoted that he was "a central figure" in the videos.

I think that's sufficient.

This will be the same Record that we all say is full of shite. Or do you think that the Record is a fair and balanced newspaper which reports accurately ?

Go away son. You are out of your depth.

[Martin]

Originally Posted by Aiden_McGeady

You say there's a lack of evidence... I give you evidence... you start talking about political parties, ignoring what I said.

You have no evidence.

[Paul67]

IMO, you often find the trouble makers at the front of the action, but as has been said, it's difficult to judge a persons actions on photographic evidence in this case.

I've not read much on the incidents, but is the guy claiming against the police? If not you'd have to question his part in the incident.

[Tamster]

Originally Posted by Martin

This will be the same Record that we all say is full of shite. Or do you think that the Record is a fair and balanced newspaper which reports accurately ?

Go away son. You are out of your depth.

So if you don't like or agree with what somebody posts you :

1) Patronise them
2) Tell them to go away


Well thought out argument there

[Martin]

Originally Posted by Paul67

IMO, you often find the trouble makers at the front of the action, but as has been said, it's difficult to judge a persons actions on photographic evidence in this case.

I've not read much on the incidents, but is the guy claiming against the police? If not you'd have to question his part in the incident.

He says he wasn't rioting.

Have you seen anything which proves he was rioting ?

[Tamster]

Originally Posted by Martin

He says he wasn't rioting.

Have you seen anything which proves he was rioting ?

thanks,


you're repetetive answers have now cured my insomnia,

goodnigh.......................................... ..............................

[Martin]

Originally Posted by Tamster

So if you don't like or agree with what somebody posts you :

1) Patronise them
2) Tell them to go away


Well thought out argument there

His posts are, to be frank, stupid.

A sixteen year old boy telling a fort year old man that HE is out of his depth.

Come on ! Would you accept that.

You're clutching at straws mate because you have had to accept that we have no proof of his guilt and that you would expect to be presumed innocent until proven guilty.

You're keen to get me on something though !

[Martin]

Originally Posted by Tamster

thanks,


you're repetetive answers have now cured my insomnia,

goodnigh.......................................... ..............................

That's not an answer, it's a question.

A question YOU refuse to answer, repeatedly.

[Paul67]

Originally Posted by Martin

He says he wasn't rioting.

Have you seen anything which proves he was rioting ?

Not seen an awful lot of the scenes tbh.

You'd have to question his innocence though if he did not take action against the police for what the lovely dog did to him.

Of course he's not going to admit to rioting, knowing fine well his season ticket would become a thing of the past.

As I say though, not seen anything other than the pic in the paper (which I thought looked great btw)